Crabs, by Peter Carey, does not follow the archetypal
structure in the traditional sense; however, it does fit in to some aspects. Crabs
does comply to archetypal structure by having a call to adventure (Crabs
wanting to have sex with Carmen), crossing a threshold (the drive-in), and the
death and rebirth (Crabs turning into a car). Trying to most of the other
aspects Crabs into archetypal criticism is like trying to fit an oval peg into
a circle hole – close, but it’s not going to fit. You could say that Frank was
his mentor, or strict father figure, but both would be loose assumptions. There
was no atonement or gift given to Crabs, but he did return changed, though as a
car, not necessarily wiser. The manager could be perceived as the helper, but
again, that would be a vague description. There was no clear revelation,
although, although Crabs did go through trials and failure, as well as growth
in new skills, from having is wheels and engine stolen (failure), to repairing
the car (new skills). Technically, you could say that Crabs fits into
archetypal structure, though very loosely, making it one of the few stories
that could be considered non-monomyth, probably due to the fact that the story
is so peculiar in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment